tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9474761.comments2010-10-10T02:59:39.788-05:00MarkMcCoy.comMarkMcCoy.comhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11668223376242773429noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9474761.post-58242610026633151392010-10-10T01:08:59.416-05:002010-10-10T01:08:59.416-05:00I think a good way to start is to boycott. Everyth...I think a good way to start is to boycott. Everything. As much as possible. Big businesses want to bleed us dry and slumlords want to take advantage of us. we aren't represented, we don't get our day or our say in court.<br /><br />Instead of watching tv and taking prozak everyone needs to realize why things are the way they are. (Greed, temp agencies, slave labor, and real estate fraud. And apathy.)<br /><br />The apathy has to stop. The biggest thing people can do, and the best: Stop buying. No more cheap garbage Made In China. <br />No more houses until it's established foreclosures won't be randomly, idiotically, wrongfully initiated. <br />Walk instead of drive. <br />The less money we spend the louder we'll be heard.H.H.https://www.blogger.com/profile/01398251023642390490noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9474761.post-3188195092285573332010-06-12T14:56:32.881-05:002010-06-12T14:56:32.881-05:00--Errors in previous message--
"It was the l...--Errors in previous message--<br /><br />"It was the law of the land until the 1938 Supreme Court ruling (Erie Railroad) which statutorized the Common Law." <br /><br />I am enjoying the many citations who have provided us, on your site.<br /><br />I have noted your comment about the "Erie" decision. A number of others have claimed that Erie is the basis for the federal resort to a wholesale shift to "administrative (probably commerical or admiralty) law." Yet, I can find nothing explicit in that ruling to suggest this. This ruling seems to be about there being no federal common law, as distinguished from state common law.<br /><br />Although, just now, I had a flash that were this interpreted in a very weird way, one might say that--at least on a federal level--all law is something other than the common law. Yet, even granting that, this would not seem to affect local courts...which should be operating under common law rules.DrTCHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11041116842519825076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9474761.post-90693894572777874422010-06-12T14:54:15.999-05:002010-06-12T14:54:15.999-05:00"It was the law of the land until the 1938 Su..."It was the law of the land until the 1938 Supreme Court ruling (Erie Railroad) which statutorized the Common Law." <br /><br />I am enjoying the many citations who have provided us, on your site.<br /><br />I have noted your comment about the "Erie" decision. A number of othere have claimed that Erie is the basis for the federal resort to a wholesale shift to "administrative (probably commerical or admiralty) law." Yet, I can find nothing explicit in that ruling to suggest this. This ruling seems to be about there being no federal common law, as distinguished from state common law.<br /><br />Although, just now, I had a flash that were this interpreted in a very weird way, one might say that--at least on a federal leval--all law is something other than the common law. Yet, even granting that, this would not seem to affect local courts...which should be operating under common law rules.DrTCHhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11041116842519825076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9474761.post-76410458246048012072010-05-16T19:57:48.875-05:002010-05-16T19:57:48.875-05:00Pete,
I'm still working on the video reformatt...Pete,<br />I'm still working on the video reformatting. I have a couple of other people looking at the video trying to get it in a standard format.<br /><br />I'll be updating the site when this is done.<br /><br />Thanks for your comments.<br /><br />Mark McCoyMarkMcCoy.comhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11668223376242773429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9474761.post-57910154135854119182010-05-09T14:40:40.675-05:002010-05-09T14:40:40.675-05:00Wow. Any updates since this was posted?
Obviousl...Wow. Any updates since this was posted? <br /><br />Obviously we're both well-aware of the difficulty of trying to get government agents to hold other government agents accountable. Fortunately you have the video evidence, if not, it's likely the cops version of the story would have set the reality in the courtroom.<br /><br />Keep fighting the good fight.<br /><br />-PeteAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9474761.post-87685688675477787382009-10-28T00:33:33.378-05:002009-10-28T00:33:33.378-05:00Ralph,
I read your entry, concentrating my fo...Ralph,<br /><br /> I read your entry, concentrating my focus on your view of citizenship. It appears we have a similar view on this subject. <br /><br /> You use the term "citizen of the several states" as opposed to "citizen of the United States" in your entry. I noticed too your use of the phrase "a citizen of one of the several States" at the end of your entry. <br /><br /> I think you, as well as others, will find the following works of mine, to be valuable on this issue:<br /><br />a) "The Effects of the Fourteenth Amendment on the Constitution of the United States"<br /><a href="http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/86908" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/86908</a><br /><br />b) "Citizen of the several States: Settled!"<br /><a href="http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/109311" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/109311</a><br /><br />c) "Privileges and Immunities of a Citizen of the several States"<br /><a href="http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/81495" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/81495</a><br /><br />d) "A Look At Corfield (On Citizenship"<br /><a href="http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/93081" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/view/93081</a><br /><br /><br />DanUnknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12930381636535213148noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9474761.post-30105126052737952912009-10-15T14:53:31.733-05:002009-10-15T14:53:31.733-05:00This is why I'm concerned that I have a websit...This is why I'm concerned that I have a website that is considered "unpatriotic" and have heard of Alex Jones. I'm so sorry this happened to you.LadyPhoenixhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11208482719456735357noreply@blogger.com